Information on Result #1307445
Linear OA(3167, 189, F3, 85) (dual of [189, 22, 86]-code), using construction X with Varšamov–Edel bound based on
- linear OA(3163, 185, F3, 82) (dual of [185, 22, 83]-code), using 2 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 2) [i] based on linear OA(3157, 177, F3, 85) (dual of [177, 20, 86]-code), using
- 7 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3164, 184, F3, 92) (dual of [184, 20, 93]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(91) ⊂ Ce(90) [i] based on
- linear OA(3164, 183, F3, 92) (dual of [183, 19, 93]-code), using an extension Ce(91) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 182 | 36−1, defining interval I = [1,91], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 92 [i]
- linear OA(3163, 183, F3, 91) (dual of [183, 20, 92]-code), using an extension Ce(90) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 182 | 36−1, defining interval I = [1,90], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 91 [i]
- linear OA(30, 1, F3, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(30, s, F3, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(91) ⊂ Ce(90) [i] based on
- 7 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3164, 184, F3, 92) (dual of [184, 20, 93]-code), using
- linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,3) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,3) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,3) [i]
- the Tetracode [i]
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.