Information on Result #150039
There is no OOA(269, 25, S2, 3, 53), because the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 16528 282690 043758 247936 / 27 > 269
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No OOA(271, 25, S2, 4, 55) | [i] | m-Reduction for OOAs | |
2 | No OOA(272, 25, S2, 4, 56) | [i] | ||
3 | No OOA(273, 25, S2, 4, 57) | [i] | ||
4 | No OOA(274, 25, S2, 4, 58) | [i] | ||
5 | No OOA(275, 25, S2, 4, 59) | [i] | ||
6 | No OOA(276, 25, S2, 4, 60) | [i] | ||
7 | No OOA(277, 25, S2, 4, 61) | [i] | ||
8 | No OOA(278, 25, S2, 4, 62) | [i] | ||
9 | No OOA(279, 25, S2, 4, 63) | [i] | ||
10 | No OOA(280, 25, S2, 4, 64) | [i] | ||
11 | No OOA(281, 25, S2, 4, 65) | [i] | ||
12 | No OOA(282, 25, S2, 4, 66) | [i] | ||
13 | No OOA(283, 25, S2, 4, 67) | [i] | ||
14 | No OOA(284, 25, S2, 4, 68) | [i] | ||
15 | No OOA(285, 25, S2, 4, 69) | [i] | ||
16 | No OOA(286, 25, S2, 4, 70) | [i] | ||
17 | No OOA(287, 25, S2, 4, 71) | [i] | ||
18 | No OOA(288, 25, S2, 4, 72) | [i] | ||
19 | No OOA(289, 25, S2, 4, 73) | [i] | ||
20 | No OOA(269, 25, S2, 4, 53) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
21 | No OOA(269, 25, S2, 5, 53) | [i] | ||
22 | No OOA(269, 25, S2, 6, 53) | [i] | ||
23 | No OOA(269, 25, S2, 7, 53) | [i] | ||
24 | No OOA(269, 25, S2, 8, 53) | [i] | ||
25 | No (16, 69, 25)-net in base 2 | [i] | Extracting Embedded OOA |