Information on Result #1849740
There is no (109, m, 120)-net in base 2 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (109, 830, 120)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2830, 120, S2, 7, 721), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 3 894890 932912 594723 800954 614979 778034 738156 527415 208744 004037 159514 304704 727994 965670 958660 152149 459058 392893 253783 961930 117973 062961 979231 260523 541652 782828 389750 905885 172845 908284 971561 141113 569325 441119 517353 656726 555290 516311 371688 795046 480504 160256 / 361 > 2830 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (109, 119)-sequence in base 2 | [i] | Net from Sequence | |
| 2 | No (109, 109+k, 120)-net in base 2 for arbitrarily large k | [i] | Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m) | |
| 3 | No (109, m, 120)-net in base 2 with unbounded m | [i] | ||
| 4 | No digital (109, 109+k, 120)-net over F2 for arbitrarily large k | [i] | ||
| 5 | No digital (109, m, 120)-net over F2 with unbounded m | [i] | ||