Information on Result #1850727

There is no (204, m, 423)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (204, 2531, 423)-net in base 3, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (204, 422)-sequence in base 3 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (204, 204+k, 423)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (204, m, 423)-net in base 3 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (204, 204+k, 423)-net over F3 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (204, m, 423)-net over F3 with unbounded m [i]