Information on Result #1850778

There is no (221, m, 457)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (221, 2735, 457)-net in base 3, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (221, 456)-sequence in base 3 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (221, 221+k, 457)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (221, m, 457)-net in base 3 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (221, 221+k, 457)-net over F3 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (221, m, 457)-net over F3 with unbounded m [i]