Information on Result #1850820

There is no (235, m, 486)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (235, 2908, 486)-net in base 3, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (235, 485)-sequence in base 3 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (235, 235+k, 486)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (235, m, 486)-net in base 3 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (235, 235+k, 486)-net over F3 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (235, m, 486)-net over F3 with unbounded m [i]