Information on Result #1851192

There is no (133, m, 416)-net in base 4 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (133, 2074, 416)-net in base 4, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (133, 415)-sequence in base 4 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (133, 133+k, 416)-net in base 4 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (133, m, 416)-net in base 4 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (133, 133+k, 416)-net over F4 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (133, m, 416)-net over F4 with unbounded m [i]