Information on Result #1851297

There is no (168, m, 522)-net in base 4 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (168, 2604, 522)-net in base 4, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (168, 521)-sequence in base 4 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (168, 168+k, 522)-net in base 4 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (168, m, 522)-net in base 4 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (168, 168+k, 522)-net over F4 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (168, m, 522)-net over F4 with unbounded m [i]