Information on Result #1851609
There is no (23, m, 107)-net in base 5 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (23, 317, 107)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(5317, 107, S5, 3, 294), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 25 093785 261150 183033 555352 858282 506414 744525 095936 822575 567153 232691 654362 972638 121248 364122 810458 435254 768317 784411 305265 979808 570744 031256 721763 093208 355049 206395 425324 306427 925804 240108 842435 574842 966161 668300 628662 109375 / 59 > 5317 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (23, 106)-sequence in base 5 | [i] | Net from Sequence | |
| 2 | No (23, 23+k, 107)-net in base 5 for arbitrarily large k | [i] | Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m) | |
| 3 | No (23, m, 107)-net in base 5 with unbounded m | [i] | ||
| 4 | No digital (23, 23+k, 107)-net over F5 for arbitrarily large k | [i] | ||
| 5 | No digital (23, m, 107)-net over F5 with unbounded m | [i] | ||