Information on Result #1851747

There is no (69, m, 294)-net in base 5 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (69, 1171, 294)-net in base 5, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 293)-sequence in base 5 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (69, 69+k, 294)-net in base 5 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (69, m, 294)-net in base 5 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (69, 69+k, 294)-net over F5 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (69, m, 294)-net over F5 with unbounded m [i]