Information on Result #1851825

There is no (95, m, 399)-net in base 5 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (95, 1591, 399)-net in base 5, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 398)-sequence in base 5 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (95, 95+k, 399)-net in base 5 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (95, m, 399)-net in base 5 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (95, 95+k, 399)-net over F5 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (95, m, 399)-net over F5 with unbounded m [i]