Information on Result #1852242

There is no (90, m, 564)-net in base 7 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (90, 1688, 564)-net in base 7, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (90, 563)-sequence in base 7 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (90, 90+k, 564)-net in base 7 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (90, m, 564)-net in base 7 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (90, 90+k, 564)-net over F7 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (90, m, 564)-net over F7 with unbounded m [i]