Information on Result #1852254

There is no (94, m, 588)-net in base 7 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (94, 1760, 588)-net in base 7, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (94, 587)-sequence in base 7 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (94, 94+k, 588)-net in base 7 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (94, m, 588)-net in base 7 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (94, 94+k, 588)-net over F7 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (94, m, 588)-net over F7 with unbounded m [i]