Information on Result #1853148

There is no (102, m, 845)-net in base 9 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (102, 2531, 845)-net in base 9, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (102, 844)-sequence in base 9 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (102, 102+k, 845)-net in base 9 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (102, m, 845)-net in base 9 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (102, 102+k, 845)-net over F9 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (102, m, 845)-net over F9 with unbounded m [i]