Information on Result #1855251

There is no (13, m, 911)-net in base 64 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (13, 909, 911)-net in base 64, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (13, 910)-sequence in base 64 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (13, 13+k, 911)-net in base 64 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (13, m, 911)-net in base 64 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (13, 13+k, 911)-net over F64 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (13, m, 911)-net over F64 with unbounded m [i]