Information on Result #1855602

There is no (39, m, 3281)-net in base 81 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (39, 3279, 3281)-net in base 81, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (39, 3280)-sequence in base 81 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (39, 39+k, 3281)-net in base 81 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (39, m, 3281)-net in base 81 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (39, 39+k, 3281)-net over F81 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (39, m, 3281)-net over F81 with unbounded m [i]