Information on Result #1855686

There is no (67, m, 5523)-net in base 81 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (67, 11043, 5523)-net in base 81, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (67, 5522)-sequence in base 81 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (67, 67+k, 5523)-net in base 81 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (67, m, 5523)-net in base 81 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (67, 67+k, 5523)-net over F81 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (67, m, 5523)-net over F81 with unbounded m [i]