Information on Result #1855731

There is no (82, m, 6724)-net in base 81 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (82, 13445, 6724)-net in base 81, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (82, 6723)-sequence in base 81 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (82, 82+k, 6724)-net in base 81 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (82, m, 6724)-net in base 81 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (82, 82+k, 6724)-net over F81 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (82, m, 6724)-net over F81 with unbounded m [i]