Information on Result #1855782

There is no (17, m, 2323)-net in base 128 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (17, 2321, 2323)-net in base 128, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (17, 2322)-sequence in base 128 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (17, 17+k, 2323)-net in base 128 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (17, m, 2323)-net in base 128 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (17, 17+k, 2323)-net over F128 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (17, m, 2323)-net over F128 with unbounded m [i]