Information on Result #1856073

There is no (36, m, 9510)-net in base 256 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (36, 9508, 9510)-net in base 256, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (36, 9509)-sequence in base 256 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (36, 36+k, 9510)-net in base 256 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (36, m, 9510)-net in base 256 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (36, 36+k, 9510)-net over F256 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (36, m, 9510)-net over F256 with unbounded m [i]