Information on Result #1856085

There is no (40, m, 10538)-net in base 256 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (40, 10536, 10538)-net in base 256, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (40, 10537)-sequence in base 256 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (40, 40+k, 10538)-net in base 256 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (40, m, 10538)-net in base 256 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (40, 40+k, 10538)-net over F256 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (40, m, 10538)-net over F256 with unbounded m [i]