Information on Result #1856319

There is no (4, m, 81)-net in base 16 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (4, 77, 81)-net in base 16, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (4, 80)-sequence in base 16 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (4, 4+k, 81)-net in base 16 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (4, m, 81)-net in base 16 with unbounded m [i]