Information on Result #1856350
There is no (11, 17)-sequence in base 2, because net from sequence would yield (11, m, 18)-net in base 2 for arbitrarily large m, but
- m-reduction [i] would yield (11, 67, 18)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(267, 18, S2, 4, 56), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 2951 479051 793528 258560 / 19 > 267 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(267, 18, S2, 4, 56), but
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (11, 17)-sequence in base 2 (for arbitrarily large k) | [i] | Logical Equivalence (for Sequences) | |
| 2 | No (11, m, 17)-net in base 2 with m > ∞ | [i] | ||
| 3 | No digital (11, 17)-sequence over F2 (for arbitrarily large k) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No digital (11, m, 17)-net over F2 with m > ∞ | [i] | ||