Information on Result #1856598

There is no (259, 270)-sequence in base 2, because net from sequence would yield (259, m, 271)-net in base 2 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (259, 270)-sequence in base 2 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (259, m, 270)-net in base 2 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (259, 270)-sequence over F2 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (259, m, 270)-net over F2 with m > ∞ [i]