Information on Result #1856709

There is no (109, 231)-sequence in base 3, because net from sequence would yield (109, m, 232)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (109, 231)-sequence in base 3 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (109, m, 231)-net in base 3 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (109, 231)-sequence over F3 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (109, m, 231)-net over F3 with m > ∞ [i]