Information on Result #1856745

There is no (145, 303)-sequence in base 3, because net from sequence would yield (145, m, 304)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (145, 303)-sequence in base 3 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (145, m, 303)-net in base 3 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (145, 303)-sequence over F3 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (145, m, 303)-net over F3 with m > ∞ [i]