Information on Result #1856763

There is no (163, 340)-sequence in base 3, because net from sequence would yield (163, m, 341)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 340)-sequence in base 3 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (163, m, 340)-net in base 3 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (163, 340)-sequence over F3 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (163, m, 340)-net over F3 with m > ∞ [i]