Information on Result #1857114
There is no (2, 15)-sequence in base 5, because net from sequence would yield (2, m, 16)-net in base 5 for arbitrarily large m, but
- m-reduction [i] would yield (2, 19, 16)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(519, 16, S5, 2, 17), but
- the linear programming bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 3124 237060 546875 / 149 > 519 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(519, 16, S5, 2, 17), but
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (2, 15)-sequence in base 5 (for arbitrarily large k) | [i] | Logical Equivalence (for Sequences) | |
2 | No (2, m, 15)-net in base 5 with m > ∞ | [i] | ||
3 | No digital (2, 15)-sequence over F5 (for arbitrarily large k) | [i] | ||
4 | No digital (2, m, 15)-net over F5 with m > ∞ | [i] |