Information on Result #1857180

There is no (68, 289)-sequence in base 5, because net from sequence would yield (68, m, 290)-net in base 5 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (68, 289)-sequence in base 5 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (68, m, 289)-net in base 5 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (68, 289)-sequence over F5 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (68, m, 289)-net over F5 with m > ∞ [i]