Information on Result #1858139

There is no (98, 2610)-sequence in base 27, because net from sequence would yield (98, m, 2611)-net in base 27 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (98, 2610)-sequence in base 27 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (98, m, 2610)-net in base 27 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (98, 2610)-sequence over F27 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (98, m, 2610)-net over F27 with m > ∞ [i]