Information on Result #1863501
There is no (1, m, 5)-net in base 2 with m > ∞, because logical equivalence would yield (1, 5)-sequence in base 2, but
- net from sequence [i] would yield (1, m, 6)-net in base 2 for arbitrarily large m, but
- m-reduction [i] would yield (1, 5, 6)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 34 > 25 [i]
- m-reduction [i] would yield (1, 5, 6)-net in base 2, but
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.