Information on Result #1864053
There is no (16, m, 41)-net in base 3 with m > ∞, because logical equivalence would yield (16, 41)-sequence in base 3, but
- net from sequence [i] would yield (16, m, 42)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, but
- m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 163, 42)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3163, 42, S3, 4, 147), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 26 544651 814199 643338 440247 651133 135698 218965 877468 993535 187581 097625 462811 569215 / 37 > 3163 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3163, 42, S3, 4, 147), but
- m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 163, 42)-net in base 3, but
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.