Information on Result #1864079
There is no (29, m, 68)-net in base 3 with m > ∞, because logical equivalence would yield (29, 68)-sequence in base 3, but
- net from sequence [i] would yield (29, m, 69)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, but
- m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 271, 69)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3271, 69, S3, 4, 242), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 2142 368937 253103 043834 638591 707247 385061 383828 483530 475078 497325 497761 213758 635430 004735 714829 845784 822552 287049 510582 282468 757069 > 3271 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3271, 69, S3, 4, 242), but
- m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 271, 69)-net in base 3, but
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.