Information on Result #1865648
There is no (0, 9)-sequence in base 8 (for arbitrarily large k), because logical equivalence would yield (0, 9)-sequence in base 8, but
- net from sequence [i] would yield (0, m, 10)-net in base 8 for arbitrarily large m, but
- m-reduction [i] would yield (0, 2, 10)-net in base 8, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 71 > 82 [i]
- m-reduction [i] would yield (0, 2, 10)-net in base 8, but
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and s, k and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.