Information on Result #1868818

There is no (16, 16+k, 42)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large k, because logical equivalence would yield (16, m, 42)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and s, k and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.