Information on Result #1869106

There is no (160, 160+k, 335)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large k, because logical equivalence would yield (160, m, 335)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and s, k and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.