Information on Result #1869116

There is no (165, 165+k, 345)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large k, because logical equivalence would yield (165, m, 345)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and s, k and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.