Information on Result #2026449

There is no OA(2126, 299, S2, 50), because adding a parity check bit would yield OA(2127, 300, S2, 51), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OA(2126, 299, S2, 51) [i]Strength Reduction
2No OA(2125, 298, S2, 50) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
3No OA(2124, 297, S2, 50) [i]
4No OA(2123, 296, S2, 50) [i]
5No OA(2122, 295, S2, 50) [i]
6No OA(2121, 294, S2, 50) [i]
7No OA(2120, 293, S2, 50) [i]
8No OOA(2127, 299, S2, 2, 51) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
9No OOA(2126, 299, S2, 2, 50) [i]Depth Reduction
10No OOA(2126, 299, S2, 3, 50) [i]
11No OOA(2126, 299, S2, 4, 50) [i]
12No OOA(2126, 299, S2, 5, 50) [i]
13No OOA(2126, 299, S2, 6, 50) [i]
14No OOA(2126, 299, S2, 7, 50) [i]
15No OOA(2126, 299, S2, 8, 50) [i]
16No (76, 126, 299)-net in base 2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array