Information on Result #2152814

There is no OA(2153, 297, S2, 64), because 2 times code embedding in larger space would yield OA(2155, 299, S2, 64), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OOA(2154, 297, S2, 2, 65) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
2No OOA(2153, 297, S2, 2, 64) [i]Depth Reduction
3No OOA(2153, 297, S2, 3, 64) [i]
4No OOA(2153, 297, S2, 4, 64) [i]
5No OOA(2153, 297, S2, 5, 64) [i]
6No OOA(2153, 297, S2, 6, 64) [i]
7No OOA(2153, 297, S2, 7, 64) [i]
8No OOA(2153, 297, S2, 8, 64) [i]
9No (89, 153, 297)-net in base 2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array