Information on Result #2156191

There is no linear OA(216, 24, F2, 8) (dual of [24, 8, 9]-code), because adding a parity check bit would yield linear OA(217, 25, F2, 9) (dual of [25, 8, 10]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(217, 24, F2, 2, 9) (dual of [(24, 2), 31, 10]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
2No linear OOA(216, 24, F2, 2, 8) (dual of [(24, 2), 32, 9]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
3No linear OOA(216, 24, F2, 3, 8) (dual of [(24, 3), 56, 9]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(216, 24, F2, 4, 8) (dual of [(24, 4), 80, 9]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(216, 24, F2, 5, 8) (dual of [(24, 5), 104, 9]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(216, 24, F2, 6, 8) (dual of [(24, 6), 128, 9]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(216, 24, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(24, 7), 152, 9]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(216, 24, F2, 8, 8) (dual of [(24, 8), 176, 9]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (8, 16, 24)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array