Information on Result #2249028

Linear OA(841, 57, F8, 29) (dual of [57, 16, 30]-code), using 8 times truncation based on linear OA(849, 65, F8, 37) (dual of [65, 16, 38]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(898, 114, F8, 59) (dual of [114, 16, 60]-code) [i]Repeating Each Code Word
2Linear OA(897, 112, F8, 59) (dual of [112, 15, 60]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(896, 110, F8, 59) (dual of [110, 14, 60]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(895, 108, F8, 59) (dual of [108, 13, 60]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(894, 106, F8, 59) (dual of [106, 12, 60]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(893, 104, F8, 59) (dual of [104, 11, 60]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(892, 102, F8, 59) (dual of [102, 10, 60]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(2180, 228, F2, 59) (dual of [228, 48, 60]-code) [i]Concatenation of Two Codes
9Linear OA(2179, 224, F2, 59) (dual of [224, 45, 60]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(2178, 220, F2, 59) (dual of [220, 42, 60]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(2177, 216, F2, 59) (dual of [216, 39, 60]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(2176, 212, F2, 59) (dual of [212, 36, 60]-code) [i]
13Linear OA(2175, 208, F2, 59) (dual of [208, 33, 60]-code) [i]
14Linear OOA(841, 28, F8, 2, 29) (dual of [(28, 2), 15, 30]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding