Information on Result #2249030

Linear OA(836, 61, F8, 24) (dual of [61, 25, 25]-code), using 4 times truncation based on linear OA(840, 65, F8, 28) (dual of [65, 25, 29]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(897, 122, F8, 49) (dual of [122, 25, 50]-code) [i]Repeating Each Code Word
2Linear OA(896, 120, F8, 49) (dual of [120, 24, 50]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(895, 118, F8, 49) (dual of [118, 23, 50]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(894, 116, F8, 49) (dual of [116, 22, 50]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(893, 114, F8, 49) (dual of [114, 21, 50]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(892, 112, F8, 49) (dual of [112, 20, 50]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(891, 110, F8, 49) (dual of [110, 19, 50]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(890, 108, F8, 49) (dual of [108, 18, 50]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(889, 106, F8, 49) (dual of [106, 17, 50]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(888, 104, F8, 49) (dual of [104, 16, 50]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(886, 100, F8, 49) (dual of [100, 14, 50]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(2162, 216, F2, 49) (dual of [216, 54, 50]-code) [i]Concatenation of Two Codes
13Linear OA(2161, 212, F2, 49) (dual of [212, 51, 50]-code) [i]
14Linear OA(2160, 208, F2, 49) (dual of [208, 48, 50]-code) [i]
15Linear OA(2159, 204, F2, 49) (dual of [204, 45, 50]-code) [i]
16Linear OOA(836, 30, F8, 2, 24) (dual of [(30, 2), 24, 25]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding