Information on Result #2419929
Linear OOA(2135, 70, F2, 2, 83) (dual of [(70, 2), 5, 84]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(2135, 70, F2, 2, 87) (dual of [(70, 2), 5, 88]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(211, 8, F2, 2, 8) (dual of [(8, 2), 5, 9]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(2119, 62, F2, 2, 78) (dual of [(62, 2), 5, 79]-NRT-code), using
- 1 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2120, 63, F2, 2, 79) (dual of [(63, 2), 6, 80]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(418, 21, F4, 15) (dual of [21, 3, 16]-code), using
- Simplex code S(3,4) [i]
- linear OOA(24, 3, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(3, 2), 2, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,2) [i]
- linear OA(418, 21, F4, 15) (dual of [21, 3, 16]-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- 1 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2120, 63, F2, 2, 79) (dual of [(63, 2), 6, 80]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.