Information on Result #2429783
Linear OOA(2260, 131, F2, 2, 188) (dual of [(131, 2), 2, 189]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(2260, 131, F2, 2, 217) (dual of [(131, 2), 2, 218]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(22, 2, F2, 2, 2) (dual of [(2, 2), 2, 3]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;2,2) [i]
- linear OOA(2256, 129, F2, 2, 214) (dual of [(129, 2), 2, 215]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 43 times [i] based on linear OOA(24, 3, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(3, 2), 2, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,2) [i]
- repeating each code word 43 times [i] based on linear OOA(24, 3, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(3, 2), 2, 5]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(22, 2, F2, 2, 2) (dual of [(2, 2), 2, 3]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(2252, 127, F2, 2, 180) (dual of [(127, 2), 2, 181]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(2248, 125, F2, 2, 176) (dual of [(125, 2), 2, 177]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||