Information on Result #2456625
Linear OOA(295, 53, F2, 2, 49) (dual of [(53, 2), 11, 50]-NRT-code), using 3 step truncation based on linear OOA(298, 55, F2, 2, 52) (dual of [(55, 2), 12, 53]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(298, 55, F2, 2, 53) (dual of [(55, 2), 12, 54]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(168, 11, F16, 8) (dual of [11, 3, 9]-code or 11-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(168, 16, F16, 8) (dual of [16, 8, 9]-code or 16-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(8,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(168, 16, F16, 8) (dual of [16, 8, 9]-code or 16-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- linear OOA(26, 5, F2, 2, 5) (dual of [(5, 2), 4, 6]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,4P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- linear OA(168, 11, F16, 8) (dual of [11, 3, 9]-code or 11-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.