Information on Result #2457826
Linear OOA(2198, 101, F2, 2, 129) (dual of [(101, 2), 4, 130]-NRT-code), using 8 step truncation based on linear OOA(2206, 105, F2, 2, 137) (dual of [(105, 2), 4, 138]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2206, 105, F2, 2, 139) (dual of [(105, 2), 4, 140]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(433, 35, F4, 27) (dual of [35, 2, 28]-code), using
- repeating each code word 7 times [i] based on linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,4) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,4) [i]
- repeating each code word 7 times [i] based on linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OOA(24, 3, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(3, 2), 2, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,2) [i]
- linear OA(433, 35, F4, 27) (dual of [35, 2, 28]-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.