Information on Result #2462685
Linear OOA(3135, 69, F3, 2, 103) (dual of [(69, 2), 3, 104]-NRT-code), using 21 step truncation based on linear OOA(3156, 80, F3, 2, 124) (dual of [(80, 2), 4, 125]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(3156, 80, F3, 2, 125) (dual of [(80, 2), 4, 126]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(918, 20, F9, 17) (dual of [20, 2, 18]-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OA(98, 10, F9, 8) (dual of [10, 2, 9]-code or 10-arc in PG(7,9)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,9) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,9) [i]
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OA(98, 10, F9, 8) (dual of [10, 2, 9]-code or 10-arc in PG(7,9)), using
- linear OOA(36, 4, F3, 2, 6) (dual of [(4, 2), 2, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,3) [i]
- linear OA(918, 20, F9, 17) (dual of [20, 2, 18]-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.