Information on Result #2462894
Linear OOA(3176, 89, F3, 2, 141) (dual of [(89, 2), 2, 142]-NRT-code), using 74 step truncation based on linear OOA(3250, 126, F3, 2, 215) (dual of [(126, 2), 2, 216]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(3250, 126, F3, 2, 218) (dual of [(126, 2), 2, 219]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 3 times [i] based on linear OOA(382, 42, F3, 2, 72) (dual of [(42, 2), 2, 73]-NRT-code), using
- 4 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(386, 44, F3, 2, 76) (dual of [(44, 2), 2, 77]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 11 times [i] based on linear OOA(36, 4, F3, 2, 6) (dual of [(4, 2), 2, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,3) [i]
- repeating each code word 11 times [i] based on linear OOA(36, 4, F3, 2, 6) (dual of [(4, 2), 2, 7]-NRT-code), using
- 4 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(386, 44, F3, 2, 76) (dual of [(44, 2), 2, 77]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 3 times [i] based on linear OOA(382, 42, F3, 2, 72) (dual of [(42, 2), 2, 73]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.