Information on Result #2468320
Linear OOA(488, 46, F4, 2, 72) (dual of [(46, 2), 4, 73]-NRT-code), using 8 step truncation based on linear OOA(496, 50, F4, 2, 80) (dual of [(50, 2), 4, 81]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(168, 10, F16, 8) (dual of [10, 2, 9]-code or 10-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(168, 16, F16, 8) (dual of [16, 8, 9]-code or 16-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(8,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(168, 16, F16, 8) (dual of [16, 8, 9]-code or 16-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- linear OOA(48, 5, F4, 2, 8) (dual of [(5, 2), 2, 9]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,4) [i]
- linear OA(168, 10, F16, 8) (dual of [10, 2, 9]-code or 10-arc in PG(7,16)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(4258, 131, F4, 2, 216) (dual of [(131, 2), 4, 217]-NRT-code) | [i] | Juxtaposition for OOAs | |