Information on Result #2474579
Linear OOA(5116, 59, F5, 2, 104) (dual of [(59, 2), 2, 105]-NRT-code), using 34 step truncation based on linear OOA(5150, 76, F5, 2, 138) (dual of [(76, 2), 2, 139]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(56, 4, F5, 2, 6) (dual of [(4, 2), 2, 7]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(56, 5, F5, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 4, 7]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;4,5) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(56, 5, F5, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 4, 7]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(5142, 72, F5, 2, 131) (dual of [(72, 2), 2, 132]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 12 times [i] based on linear OOA(510, 6, F5, 2, 10) (dual of [(6, 2), 2, 11]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,5) [i]
- repeating each code word 12 times [i] based on linear OOA(510, 6, F5, 2, 10) (dual of [(6, 2), 2, 11]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(56, 4, F5, 2, 6) (dual of [(4, 2), 2, 7]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.